MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6906442218 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/bajrw

Health literacy and treatment adherence in breast cancer patients: a scoping review protocol

2021· other· en· W6906442218 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Science Framework · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerProtocol (science)Health literacyScope (computer science)eHealthMEDLINEmHealth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a protocol for a scoping review that aims to systematically scope the literature and determine what is known about the effects of health literacy (HL) on treatment adherence in breast cancer (BC) patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.095
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.104
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0950.104
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.010
Bibliometrics0.0130.011
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0080.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0770.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.573
Teacher spread0.489 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Science FrameworkSame topicHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207