MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6906522265 · doi:10.17895/ices.pub.25682811

Microsatellite Population Genetics and Juvenile Skeena Sockeye Migration

2015· other· en· W6906522265 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpawn (biology)TributaryJuvenilePopulationMicrosatellitePhenology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No abstracts are to be cited without prior reference to the author.Sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) support the most valuable commercial fishery of the Canadian Pacific coast. We used microsatellite DNA to characterize aspects of sockeye salmon ecology of the Skeena River. The different Skeena sockeye populations which originate from approximately 28 rearing lakes, migrate to sea in May and June. Sockeye salmon smolts migrate earlier from lakes that are closer to the coast than from lakes that are further inland. While it has long been known that the different populations of adult sockeye salmon return to the Skeena River, and to Babine Lake tributaries in a characteristic sequence, our results demonstrate that the phenology of downstream migration for different populations of sockeye salmon smolts is also structured by timing and geography. Babine Lake, which produces approximately 80% of all Skeena sockeye salmon, may be divided into several subpopulations. Genetic analysis of samples collected in 2014 shows that juvenile sockeye originating from tributaries to different sections of Babine Lake had distinctive timing. 84.3% of the earlier migrants came from populations that spawn in the northern section closest to the lake outlet, while 87.6 % of later migrants came from populations that spawn in the middle and upper sections of the lake.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic SystemsFrench-language works237,207