MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6906558715 · doi:10.17632/j632j79nkf

Exchange rates and fundamentals

2025· dataset· en· W6906558715 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMendeley Data · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonetary policyExchange rateEquity (law)Volatility (finance)GeopoliticsInterest rateEconomic forecastingEconomic indicatorEconomic data

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dataset comprises monthly time series for exchange rates among the United States, Japan, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Italy. Explanatory variables include the output; the 3-month interest rates, the CPI, economic policy uncertainty indices, financial risk indicators such as implied equity market volatility (VIX), and geopolitical risk indicator, the U.S. monetary policy uncertainty, the U.S. trade policy uncertainty, the U.S. monetary policy surprise, term spread, and dividend yields. Macroeconomic series are drawn from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (FRED), OECD Main Economic Indicators, IMF International Financial Statistics, and national statistical agencies. Economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk indices come from policyuncertainty.com and the Caldara–Iacoviello dataset. Quarterly GDP data are interpolated to monthly frequency using the Chow–Lin method to match the frequency of other series. Monthly GDP data are obtained by interpolation. The EPU data are smoothed by a local level model. The explanatory data are transformed by natural logarithms. The sample spans January 1999 to March 2025, subject to data availability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.053

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMendeley DataSame topicFinancial Risk and Volatility ModelingFrench-language works237,207