MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6906612901 · doi:10.17632/38fdw7sm62.1

Vertical deformation rate during 2017-2023 near Ciudad Guzmán, Jalisco, Mexico, computed from Sentinel-1 data using MSBAS software

2024· dataset· en· W6906612901 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeformation (meteorology)Track (disk drive)SubsidenceStandard deviationSoftwareFrame (networking)Horizontal and verticalLevelling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vertical deformation rate during 2017-2023 near Ciudad Guzmán, Jalisco, Mexico, computed from Sentinel-1 ascending (Track 049 Frame 0059) and descending (Track 012 Frame 0526) data using MSBAS software (Samsonov and d‘Oreye, 2017). The results have not been validated. The presence of upward deformation cannot be explained and can be a processing artifact. Files bperp_049_0059 - interferogram baselines for track 049 bperp_012_0526 - interferogram baselines for track 012 MSBAS_LINEAR_RATE_UD - vertical linear deformation rate measured in m/year MSBAS_LINEAR_RATE_STD_UD - standard deviation of the vertical linear deformation rate measured in m/year MSBAS_LINEAR_RATE_R2_UD - coefficient of determination R2 Guzman_time_series - time series of 5x5 pixel region centred at the subsidence extrema at Ciudad Guzmán References Samsonov, S. and d‘Oreye, N. 2017. Multidimensional Small Baseline Subset (MSBAS) for Two-Dimensional Deformation Analysis: Case Study Mexico City. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 43, 318–329, https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2017.1344926 Contact See readme.pdf

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)Same topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207