MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6906633592 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/zs48y

ALIGN: Advancing Learning in Neurorehabilitation

2025· other· en· W6906633592 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Science Framework · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurorehabilitationOutcome (game theory)RehabilitationWork (physics)Neurological rehabilitationSpinal cord injury

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This scoping review will support the development of a patient-centred measurement (PCM) framework for neurorehabilitation within Alberta’s Learning Health System (LHS). The framework will guide the standardized collection of outcome measures across stroke, traumatic brain injury (TBI), and spinal cord injury (SCI) populations to inform precision rehabilitation and continuous learning from clinical practice. A key barrier to implementing such a framework is that existing core outcome measure sets for these populations are typically designed for research purposes rather than for routine clinical workflows. Moreover, these sets are not integrated across conditions, resulting in a fragmented measurement landscape for clinicians. To address this gap, we will conduct a scoping review to synthesize clinical and patient-reported outcome measures recommended for use in neurorehabilitation for stroke, TBI, and SCI. The results will provide a consolidated view of existing recommended measures and inform the co-design of an outcome measurement framework tailored for real-world clinical use. This work is a foundational step toward improving patient-centred care, supporting precision rehabilitation, and enabling continuous learning within Alberta’s neurorehabilitation services. Expected outcomes include a comprehensive summary of recommended outcome measures and practical insights to guide their integration into clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Science FrameworkFrench-language works237,207