Zooplankton Monitoring in the ICES Area: A summary of sampling sites and recent findings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstracts are to be cited without prior reference to the author.Every other year, the Working Group on Zooplankton Ecology (WGZE) produces a summary report on the status of zooplankton populations in the ICES area based on time-series obtained from national monitoring programs. Since its first report in 2000, this WGZE summary hasbeen expanded to include over 32 monitoring sites, ranging from fixed stations to standard surveys and transects, each from 10 to 40+ years in length. These sites are distributed on the continental margins of both North America and Europe and cover an area from the temperate latitudes south of Portugal to the colder regions north of Norway, Iceland, and Canada. Data from several fixed CPR routes that cover coastal and oceanic waters in the North Atlantic are also included, as well as co-sampled phytoplankton and temperature data (when available). WGZE also maintains an online interactive map (http://WGZE.net) which summarizes the zooplankton monitoring sites and provides figures, data, and/or contact information for each site
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".