A Summary Of Global Stock Recovery Plans For Marine Organisms, Including Indicative Information On The Time To Recovery, And Associated Regime Changes That May Affect Recruitment And Recovery Success
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstracts are to be cited without prior reference to the author.A desk study searched primary and grey literature, the WWW, and through personal communications, for any evidence of stock recovery plans or fisheries closures promoting recovery of depleted stocks. Rarely is complete information on stock recovery plans reported, so analysis of this provisional listing can only be indicative, but forms a useful starting point for a database on this important subject. Some 58 cases were found where a recovery effort has apparently been attempted, with 11 (46%) for demersal resources, 8 (67%) for pelagic fish stocks and 8 (67%) for invertebrates, showing some degree of success. Although it is premature to discuss success rates or time for recovery given that most recovery efforts began after 1995, where recovery times have been documented, these ranged from 3+ to 30 yr, with demersal recovery periods generally longer than for pelagics. A categorisation of resource suggests that for ‘irregular’, ‘spasmodic’ and ‘periodic’ resources, a formal recovery effort is only likely to be successful short of closure if carried out in periods of high productivity, and a main objective of management should be to ensure survival of a broad range of age classes until the next good period for recruitment. For invertebrates, ‘recovery’ may be spontaneous, and tied to declines in finfish predators. Other information relevant to recovery planning was reviewed, including empirical estimates of periods of natural low productivity from relevant time series. From published estimates of periodicities in finfish time-series and the long-term climatic data which would affect recovery time, the median duration of poor production and presumably poor recruitment, is 4-6 yr for non-depleted stocks, and 75% of periods of poor production fall within intervals of 10-11 yr or less. Other studies however suggest that periods as long as 30 yr may be dominant. A simulation assumed that a stock is now within a poor recruitment regime, and that adding 2 better-than-average ycs is one feasible criterion for recovery. The probability of good recruitment occurring, and the further duration of a poor regime, determine the duration of the recovery period. For a range of assumptions for these 2 parameters, recovery time may extend from 4-8 yr to 14-22 yr or longer. The stock-recruit relationship has been shown to differ for Canadian stocks between good and poor regimes, and the dangers of estimating recovery times by extrapolating from spawner-recruit data collected during high production regimes is illustrated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".