DEMONETIZATION AND ITS IMPACT: A STUDY ON INDIAN FMCG SECTOR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Demonetization of all the Rs.500 and Rs.1000 denomination banknotes is an attempt to curb black money, fake notes and to achieve other ancillary objectives. Numerous debates have been held over this move and various pros and cons of demonetization have come into picture. Against these backdrops, in this paper it is tried to find out the immediate effect of demonetization on the FMCG sector. It is likely that immediate cash crunch arising out of demonetization is likely to impact the sales and other performance of FMCG Companies. Analysis is made on the quarterly performance on the selected FMCG companies and annual reports are thoroughly scrutinized to find out the views of the companies concerned on demonetization and its effect. The content analysis is made by searching for terms Like “demonetization”, cash-crunch cash shortage etc. The analysis reveals that most of the sample companies have made some disclosure in the annual report on demonetization. Our analysis reveals that for 7 companies there is absolute negative growth in sales and for 4 companies sales growth is lower as compared to sales growth of corresponding quarter of previous year in respect of December end quarter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.039 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".