Report of the Second Workshop on Redfish and Oceanographic Conditions (WKREDOCE 2)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Workshop on Redfish and Oceanographic Conditions (WKREDOCE) was established as a response to a request for advice from NEAFC (Northeast Atlantic Fisheries Commission) to ICES. The objective of the workshop is to analyze the distribution of pelagic redfish in the Irminger Sea and adjacent waters in relation to environmental changes. The establishing meeting, held in September 2011 and chaired by Kristján Kristinsson (Iceland) identified possible data sources and set the objectives to address the ToR (Section 1.5). It was also agreed that the preliminary analysis should proceed by correspondence between workshop participants and include experts from each lab. Intersessionally, data sources were identified and preliminary analyses were car-ried out. The present meeting, attended by ten participants from Canada, the Faroe Islands, Greenland, Germany, Iceland, Netherlands and Russia reviewed the data and two preliminary analyses examining redfish distribution in relation to its environment, one on a seasonal scale, the other interannually. An annual index analysis of SPG intensity, water temperature in relation to the position of the S. mentella centre of mass (centroid) indicates that an intensification in the SPG together with the corresponding temperature increase in the north-eastern Irminger Sea appears to result in an interannual displacement of S. mentella south-westwards to more cold and fresh waters. Based on fishery data, in April–July, the densest and most stable aggregations are generally distributed in the northern part of the Irminger Sea in vertically averaged temperature ranging from 4.3 to 7.7°С, in Atlantic water advected by the Irminger Current. In August-September, the densest concentrations of S. mentella are found in shallower layers, in southern Irminger Basin and northwest Atlantic mid-ocean channel, in the modified Atlantic waters in 3.4–6.7°С. The results at the seasonal and interannual time scale are concordant, such that the SPG increases intensity towards autumn and winter, concentrations of fish to displacing south-westwards in certain (warmer years) and at the end of the fishing season.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".