MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6906733330 · doi:10.17863/cam.93616

Surface Ozone and Population Health

2022· dissertation· en· W6906733330 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueApollo (University of Cambridge) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationFilter (signal processing)Work (physics)Term (time)Quality (philosophy)Ozone layer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atmospheric ozone is attracting ever-growing research attention, as i) stratospheric ozone depletion will expose the biosphere to stronger hazardous ultraviolet radiation, which has been emphasised in the Montreal Protocol; ii) ozone as a greenhouse gas can alter the atmospheric thermodynamics; iii) ambient ozone is associated with adverse effects on ecosystem and population health through exposure; and iv) sophisticated photochemical mechanisms make the parametrisation for numerical modelling a chasing-deer challenge (Chapter 1). Original research starts from the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), which collates an ensemble of Earth system models to simulate the global surface ozone for the purpose of diagnosis-oriented mutual comparison. The author systematically diagnoses 8 models with supports from a collection of auxiliary features and in situ observations (Chapter 2). Interpreted from the semi-quantitative diagnosis outcomes, geographical incoherence can be ascribed to the erroneous emission inventories; incongruous longitudinal trends result from the disagreements in radical simulation; and central biases are attributable to the high uncertainties in simulating the photolysis rate and reservoir formation. Ensemble-based model diagnosis can point out possible directions for the revision of CMIP6 models. Ozone isopleths describe the non-linear responses of ozone concentrations to changes in precursors, nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and thus are pivotal to the determination of ozone regulation requirements. The author innovatively uses the Community Multiscale Air Quality model with High-order Decoupled Direct Method (CMAQ-HDDM) to simulate surface ozone across China domain in 2017, and simultaneously derive ozone isopleths for individual cities (Chapter 3). Interpreted from the city-level isopleths, densely populated metropolitan agglomerations such as Jing-Jin-Ji, Yangtze River Delta, and Pearl River Delta follow the NOx-saturated regime, indicating NOx controlling will increase ozone. Ambient ozone in eastern China generally follows the VOC-limited regime, suggesting reducing VOCs will more effectively suppress the ozone pollution; while contrarily in western regions. Therefore, city-specific ozone isopleths are instrumental in forming differentiated strategies for ozone abatement of Chinese cities. Settling the cross-model discrepancies to achieve more accurate predictions of surface ozone is an unsolved challenge, and methods that overcome structural biases in models going beyond naïve weighted averaging of multiple models is urgently required. Building on CMIP6, a conventional aggressive ensemble-learning-based algorithm is transplanted, and also a more conservative 2-stage enhanced space-time neural network ensembler is optimised to fuse 57 simulations, both of which have revealed outstanding performances (Chapter 4). The conventional approach is computationally cheaper and achieves slightly higher accuracy, but at the expense of sacrificing the model interpretability and leaving the oceanic overestimation unsolved. The conservative approach performs better in spatial generalisation and enables perceivable interpretability, but requires heavier computational burdens, which is a prior choice in multi-model fusion when computation resources permit. Followed by the multi-model fusion, a space-time Bayesian neural network downscaler has been constructed (Chapter 5) to realise urban-rural distinguished 10 km × 10 km spatial resolution surface ozone prediction with excellent methodological reliability and fair prediction accuracy. Based on the predictions in 8-hour maximum daily average metric, the global rural-site surface ozone were 15.1±7.4 ppb higher than urban sites averaged across 30 historical years, with developing countries being of the most evident differences. The globe-wide urban surface ozone were climbing by 1.9±2.3 ppb per decade, except for the de-creasing trends in eastern United States. On the other hand, the global rural surface ozone tended to remain constant, except for the rising trends in China and India. The novel framework contributes to the deep-learning-driven environmental studies methodologically by providing a brand-new feasible way to realise data fusion and downscaling, which maintains high in-terpretability by conforming to the principles of spatial statistics without compromising the prediction accuracy. Furthermore, the spatial resolved monthly surface ozone dataset with multiple metrics has lain a solid foundation for global health impact studies. To provide more accurate estimations for the risk association between long-term ozone exposure and multi-cause mortalities, the author updates the existing systematic reviews by including recent studies and unifying the exposure metrics (Chapter 6). Cross-metric conversion factors are estimated linearly by decadal observations. A total of 25 studies involving 226,453,067 participants are included in the systematic review. The pooled relative risks associated with each 10 ppb incremental ozone exposure, by mean of the warm-season daily maximum 8-h average metric, are RR=1.014 with 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging 1.009–1.019 for all-cause mortality; 1.025 (95% CI: 1.010–1.040) for respiratory mortality; and 1.019 (95% CI: 1.004–1.035) for cardiovascular mortality. Adjustment for exposure metrics lays a more solid foundation for multi-study meta-analysis. To fill in the research gap, the author has estimated the long-term ozone exposure-associated excess mortalities in urban and rural residents globally during 1990-2019 (Chapter 7), by linking the machine-learning-generated high-resolution surface ozone concentration archives (Chapter 4 and 5) with the most up-to-date meta-analysis pooled relative risks (Chapter 6). Ozone exposure-associated all-cause excess mortality was climbing from 0.92 (95% CI: 0.58 to 1.27) million in 1990 to 1.33 (95% CI: 0.83 to 1.85) million in 2019. Rural excess mortalities kept surpassing the urban deaths over the 30 years. Ozone-attributable cardiovascular mortalities were higher than the respiratory deaths, which have been overlooked in previous studies. Urban-rural environmental inequality finally leads to population health injustice, requiring future pertinent pollution control considerations at policy-level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApollo (University of Cambridge)→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→