MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6906751359 · doi:10.17863/cam.45201

Cancer risks associated with germline PALB2 pathogenic variants - an international study of 524 families

2019· article· en· W6906751359 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueApollo (University of Cambridge) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBRCA gene mutations in cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMedical Research Councillékařská fakulta Univerzity KarlovyManchester Biomedical Research CentreNational Institutes of HealthCongressionally Directed Medical Research ProgramsDirection Générale de l’offre de SoinsVlaamse regeringSahlgrenska UniversitetssjukhusetLietuvos Mokslo TarybaUniversiti MalayaNational Cancer InstituteKuopion Yliopistollinen SairaalaNIH Office of the DirectorOulun YliopistoUniversity of TorontoNational Medical Research CouncilLunds UniversitetMinistero della SaluteCancer AustraliaNational Breast Cancer FoundationNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchEuropean CommissionMinisterstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské RepublikyAkademiska SjukhusetAcademy of FinlandBreast Cancer Research FoundationUniversity of CambridgeWellcome TrustCancer Research UKGovernment of CanadaNational Health and Medical Research CouncilInstitut National Du CancerYayasan Sime DarbyUppsala UniversitetMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaFondation du cancer du sein du QuébecSusan G. KomenDipartimenti di EccellenzaAssociazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul CancroGenome CanadaItä-Suomen YliopistoUniverzita Karlova v PrazeMyriad GeneticsVšeobecná Fakultní Nemocnice v PrazeUniversity of Miami
KeywordsPALB2Breast cancerPopulationCancerRisk factors for breast cancerRisk factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE To estimate age-specific relative and absolute cancer risks for breast cancer, and to estimate risks of ovarian, pancreatic, male breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers associated with germline PALB2 pathogenic variants (PVs) as these risks have not been extensively characterized. METHODS We analysed data from 524 families with PALB2 PVs from 21 countries. Complex segregation analysis was used to estimate relative risks (RRs, relative to country-specific population incidences) and absolute risks of cancers. The models allowed for residual familial aggregation of breast and ovarian cancer and were adjusted for the family-specific ascertainment schemes. RESULTS We found associations between PALB2 PVs and risk of female breast cancer (RR=7.18; 95% CI: 5.82-8.85, p=6.5×10-76), ovarian cancer (RR=2.91; 95% CI: 1.40-6.04, p=4.1×10-3), pancreatic cancer (RR=2.37; 95% CI: 1.24-4.50; p=8.7×10-3), and male breast cancer (RR=7.34, 95% CI: 1.28-42.18, p=2.6×10-2). There no evidence for increased risks of prostate or colorectal cancer. The breast cancer RRs declined with age (p-trend=2.0×10-3). After adjusting for family-ascertainment, breast cancer risk estimates based on multiple case families were similar to the estimates from families ascertained through population-based studies (p-difference=0.41). Based on the combined data, the estimated risks to age 80 years were 53% (95% CI: 44-63%) for female breast cancer, 5% (95% CI: 2-10%) for ovarian cancer, 2-3% (95% CI: females: 1-4%; males: 2-5%) for pancreatic cancer, and 1% (95% CI: 0.2-5%) for male breast cancer. CONCLUSION These results confirm PALB2 as a key breast cancer susceptibility gene and establish substantial associations between germline PALB2 PVs and ovarian, pancreatic, and male breast cancers. These findings will facilitate incorporation of PALB2 into risk prediction models and optimise the clinical cancer risk management of PALB2 PV carriers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApollo (University of Cambridge)Same topicBRCA gene mutations in cancerFrench-language works237,207