MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6906880686 · doi:10.18130/1zn0-vk68

The Smart Fan; An Actor-Network Theory Analysis of the Montreal Protocol

2025· article· en· W6906880686 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibra · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInformation Systems Theories and Implementation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociotechnical systemDeskAir conditioningSustainabilityEfficient energy useEnergy consumptionPopularityPlan (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past century, air conditioning (AC) systems have evolved from a novel invention to a widespread household necessity in many developed countries. A cooled environment provides numerous benefits; however, the popularity of AC technology raises environmental concerns. In this portfolio I explore ways to improve the environmental sustainability of air conditioning through two related projects. For modern AC systems, energy consumption has been a primary concern. Therefore, one avenue of improvement is replacing or supplementing conventional AC systems with energy efficient alternatives. To make alternatives to AC more appealing, I will present a design for “The Smart Fan”, a portable desk fan that automatically re-orients itself to blow air on a user as they move. This device aims to combine the efficiency of an electric fan with some of the convenience of AC. Working on a team with three other students, I will develop and test a prototype of The Smart Fan. The evolution of cooling technology is dependent not only on engineering work, but on the sociotechnical networks that facilitate their use. Therefore, in the STS project, I will consider the global phase-out of CFCs as a case study in the adoption of more sustainable cooling technologies, using Actor-Network Theory to analyze the processes leading to its success. Together, these complementary projects will shed light on the technical and social aspects of cooling technology, both of which must be addressed to reduce its environmental impact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.009
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibraSame topicInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207