MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6907166609 · doi:10.18739/a2m61br5m

The SUMup collaborative database: Surface mass balance, subsurface temperature and density measurements from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets (2025 release)

2025· dataset· en· W6907166609 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueCalifornia Digital Library · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNetCDFGreenland ice sheetScripting languageIce coreCore (optical fiber)Ice sheetData quality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The SUMup database is a compilation of surface mass balance (SMB), subsurface temperature and density measurements from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. This 2025 release contains 7 795 894 data points: 2 738 170 SMB measurements, 2 866 260 density measurements and 2 191 464 subsurface temperature measurements. This is respectively +160 505 and +292 056 observations of density and temperature compared to the 2024 release. Despite many additions of SMB data, there are 119 086 fewer SMB measurements than in 2024 due to the removal of some radar data with quality issues. Note that the accumulated SMB is given, not accumulation rates. The data files are provided in both CSV and NetCDF format and contain, for each measurement: latitude, longitude, elevation, timestamp, method, reference of the data source (as bibtex key and as short/long string) and, when applicable, the name of the measurement group it belongs to (e.g. core name for SMB, profile name for density, station name for temperature). Data users are asked to cite all the original data sources that are being used and a bibtex bibliography is provided to facilitate this. Issues about this release as well as suggestions of datasets to be added in next releases can be done on a dedicated user forum: https://github.com/SUMup-database/SUMup-data-suggestion/issues. We also provide example scripts to use the SUMup 2025 files (https://github.com/SUMup-database/SUMup-example-scripts) as well as the compilation scripts used to build the database (https://github.com/SUMup-database/SUMup-2025-compilation-scripts). SUMup is a community effort and help to compile and curate the database is welcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0820.116

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCalifornia Digital LibrarySame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207