MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6907248588 · doi:10.21227/9dgb-z777

ExoNet Database: Wearable Camera Images of Human Locomotion Environments

2022· dataset· en· W6907248588 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE DataPort · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWearable computerConvolutional neural networkRoboticsDeep learningRGB color modelRobotExoskeletonRobot vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Recent advances in computer vision and deep learning have allowed researchers to develop environment recognition systems for robotic leg prostheses and exoskeletons. However, small-scale and private training datasets have impeded the widespread development and dissemination of image classification algorithms (e.g., convolutional neural networks) for recognizing human walking environments. To address these limitations, we developed "ExoNet" - the first open-source, large-scale hierarchical database of high-resolution wearable camera images (i.e., egocentric perception) of legged locomotion environments. Unparalleled in both scale and diversity, ExoNet contains over 5.6 million RGB images of indoor and outdoor real-world walking environments, which were collected using a lightweight wearable camera system throughout the summer, fall, and winter seasons. Approximately 923,000 images in ExoNet were human-annotated using a novel, 12-class hierarchical labelling architecture. Available publicly through IEEE DataPort, ExoNet offers an unprecedented shared platform to train, develop, and compare next-generation image classification algorithms for human locomotion environment recognition. In addition to robotic leg prostheses and exoskeletons, applications of ExoNet could extend to humanoids, autonomous legged robots, powered wheelchairs, and other mobility assistive technologies.References:1) Laschowski B, McNally W, Wong A, and McPhee J. (2020). ExoNet Database: Wearable Camera Images of Human Locomotion Environments. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7, 562061. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.562061.2) Laschowski B, McNally W, Wong A, and McPhee J. (2021). Computer Vision and Deep Learning for Environment-Adaptive Control of Robotic Lower-Limb Exoskeletons. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). DOI: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630064. 3) Laschowski B, McNally W, Wong A, and McPhee J. (2021). Environment Classification for Robotic Leg Prostheses and Exoskeletons using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Frontiers in Neurorobotics. DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2021.730965.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1080.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE DataPortFrench-language works237,207