Effects of Methylglyoxal on the Extracellular Matrix and its Interaction with Cardiac Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is ranked the second leading cause of death in Canada, with 53,704 heart disease-related deaths documented in 2020 alone. After a patient sustains cardiac injury, such as a myocardial infarction (MI), the heart is often unable to undergo sufficient self-recovery for healthy cardiac regeneration and repair; this is largely attributed to fibrotic tissue development at the injury site and subsequent pathological ventricular remodeling. The prevalence of MI events has created a considerable demand to develop novel strategies for effective and safe post-MI therapies. Research has indicated that post-MI modifications interfere with endogenous cardiac repair mechanisms, resulting in a pathological state. After an infarction, there is an accumulation of methylglyoxal (MG) at the site of injury. It has been suggested that MG contributes to ventricular fibrotic development, however its underlying mechanism remains unclear. Additionally, the effects that the post-MI cardiac environment, specifically MG accumulation, has on post-MI therapies and biomaterials has not been sufficiently established. Accordingly, the primary focus of this research project is to elucidate the effects of MG on the collagen-rich extracellular matrix (ECM) of the heart and key cardiac cells involved in the repair process. Further, the interaction between MG and a promising collagen-based hydrogel therapy is investigated, exploring the effects of MG on the hydrogel’s degradative process. It was found that the MG modification of hydrogels did not alter the degradation rate. Additionally, the degradation products of hydrogels, and MG-modified substrates did not affect the properties and formation of myofibroblasts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".