MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6907358959 · doi:10.21227/jrrg-hf02

Data set for Augmented Reality-Enhanced Microwave-based Wireless Monitoring System for Smart Coating Applications

2024· dataset· en· W6907358959 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE DataPort · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoatingOperabilityWirelessStructural health monitoringSet (abstract data type)Interface (matter)VisualizationData acquisition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The critical impact of coating wear on structural stability and safety has initiated extensive research in the development of real-time coating health monitoring systems for aircraft, naval vessels, and infrastructure. Among the various developed systems, microwave-based systems have garnered significant interest for their real-time and remote operability but struggle with poor localization capabilities over large surfaces. This work presents and investigates the wear detection and localization capabilities of a smart coating system that leverages embedded microwave-based passive split ring resonator (SRR) sensors. The system performance is validated by observing its resonant response during the erosion of the coating through both mechanical and chemical erosion. Furthermore, the work examines the potential of the developed SRR array to localize the region of coating damage through AI-based post-processing techniques, enabling real-time wear localization over extensive surfaces including aircraft and pipelines. Additionally, a cloud-based augmented reality system is integrated for out-of-sight monitoring of coating wear, thereby enhancing visual identification, ease of system data interpretation and faster decision-making, promising their robust application in harsh industrial environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE DataPortFrench-language works237,207