MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6907425510 · doi:10.21227/d2rh-kw72

DALHOUSIE NIMS LAB ATTACK DATASET 2025-1

2025· dataset· en· W6907425510 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE DataPort · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicComplex Systems and Decision Making
Canadian institutionsSolana Networks (Canada)Dalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet of ThingsVulnerability (computing)Raspberry piThe InternetVulnerability assessment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DALHOUSIE NIMS LAB ATTACK IOT DATASET 2025-1 dataset comprises of four prevalent types attacks, namely Portscan, Slowloris, Synflood, and Vulnerability Scan, on nine distinct Internet of Things (IoT) devices. These attacks are very common on the IoT eco-systems because they often serve as precursors to more sophisticated attack vectors. By analyzing attack vector traffic characteristics and IoT device responses, our dataset will aid to shed light on IoT eco-system vulnerabilities. A Raspberry Pi was utilized to launch the attacks, targetting the devices in a controlled environment and each attack lasted 50 minutes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.222
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE DataPortSame topicComplex Systems and Decision MakingFrench-language works237,207