MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6907455118 · doi:10.22055/pyk.2022.17671

Analyzing the Structural and Aesthetic Elements of Sarouk Rugs of the Claremont Collection

2022· article· en· W6907455118 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuasicrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpace (punctuation)Quarter (Canadian coin)SalientWorld War IIFashion design

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Problem Definition: Sarouk rugs are one of the most crucial rug brands in Iran and one of the most famous rugs among the world audience, which were produced from the middle of the 19th century until the beginning of World War II under the management of French companies, especially Ziegler. There are samples of these rugs with Corner and Medallion designs and a unique structure in the Claremont collection, which differ from common samples regarding the type of design pattern. The limitation of comprehensive and salient research resources about Sarouk rug and its exquisite and export samples that were produced in the past reveals more of the necessity of research on this issue. The main research question is "What are the features, visual qualities, and structural elements of Claremont Collection rugs?"Objective: In the present research, the structural elements of Sarouk rugs of the last quarter of the 19th century, which are preserved in the Claremont Collection, will be analyzed. This article's structural and aesthetic elements include the background space, Medallion (Toranj) and space above Medallion (Sar Toranj), Corner, Margins, and the colors used.Research Method: This research is qualitative and fundamental, and the research method is descriptive-analytical. The method of collecting data is library-based in addition to searching the websites.Results: The Sarouk rugs produced in the late 19th century, which were woven for export, are all of the Corner and Medallion design and are unique in their design pattern and color. They are often produced on large scales with vegetable dyes. The color of the Margin and background change between red, navy, and ivory colors. In some rugs, the color of the central Medallion is the same as that of the Margin and Corner. All these rugs are various in Corner and Medallion design, and the central Medallion forms the structure and identity of Shakhe Shekasteh motifs (cursive-curve). The structure of the designing pattern, the logical color scheme and the visual order of the motifs are the differences between Sarouk rugs and other Iranian rugs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it