MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Scores du Health Utilities Index Mark 3 pour enfants et adolescents : normes pour la population canadienne selon les cycles 5 (2016 et 2017) et 6 (2018 et 2019) de l’Enquête canadienne sur les mesures de la santé

2023· article· fr· W6907571992 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueStatistics Canada Dissemination · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationResearch methodologyIndex (typography)Context (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les scores d’utilité sont un outil important pour évaluer la qualité de vie liée à la santé. Des normes de scores d’utilité ont été publiées pour les adultes canadiens; cependant, il n’existe aucune norme de scores d’utilité qui soit représentative à l’échelle nationale pour les personnes non adultes. Fondée sur les données du Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) provenant des deux derniers cycles de l’Enquête canadienne sur les mesures de la santé (c.-à-d. 2016-2017 et 2018-2019), cette première étude du genre fournit des normes de scores d’utilité pour les enfants de 6 à 11 ans et les adolescents de 12 à 17 ans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.029
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.085
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score0.491

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0290.085
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStatistics Canada Dissemination→Same topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life→French-language works237,207→