MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Electricity Demand Forecasting for Microload Management

2012· dataset· en· W6907670745 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Northampton Research Explorer · 2012
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicErosion and Abrasive Machining
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData setPower consumptionDemand forecastingConsumption (sociology)Interval (graph theory)Interval dataWeather forecastingElectricity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This data set comprises microload consumption extracted and processed from one home in Vancouver, Canada, from April 2012 to the end of March 2014 [1]. The different microloads’ data were cleaned and processed. The weather data was hourly, and the microload consumptions were in minute intervals. The time interval of one hour was processed into minutely weather data. Three months of data comprising the weather and the microloads was selected from the process data and used to generate what is presented here. Reference: [1] S. Makonin, “Ampds2: the almanac of minutely power dataset (version2),” Harvard Dataverse, p. V2, 2016

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Northampton Research ExplorerSame topicErosion and Abrasive MachiningFrench-language works237,207