MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

WATER RESILIENCE ASSESSMENT DI HULU DAS BATANG ARAU: ANALISIS KESEIMBANGAN SUPPLY – DEMAND BERBASIS PEMODELAN SWAT

2025· article· id· W6907742278 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Teknologi Pertanian Andalas · 2025
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEngineering
TopicWetland Management and Conservation
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrology (agriculture)Water balanceWater supplyWatershed

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perubahan iklim dan aktivitas antropogenik menyebabkan tekanan signifikan terhadap sumber daya air, mempengaruhi keseimbangan ketersediaan dan kebutuhan air di berbagai daerah aliran sungai. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi ketahanan sumber daya air (water resilience) di hulu DAS Batang Arau, Kota Padang dengan menggunakan pendekatan terpadu berbasis pemodelan hidrologi SWAT dan analisis Reliability, Resilience, Vulnerability (RRV). Metode penelitian meliputi: (1) karakterisasi morfometri DAS dengan menganalisis 19 parameter morfometri; (2) pemodelan SWAT dengan kalibrasi-validasi yang menghasilkan nilai performa bervariasi (R² = 0,54-0,97) dan sangat baik (NSE = 0,79-0,89); (3) analisis keseimbangan supply-demand; serta (4) evaluasi ketahanan air dengan pendekatan RRV. Hasil analisis morfometri menunjukkan DAS memiliki bentuk memanjang (Form Factor 0,25) dengan kerapatan drainase sedang (1,40 km/km²). Pemodelan SWAT menghasilkan debit andalan Q80 sebesar 1,51 m³/s yang masih mencukupi total kebutuhan air 0,63 m³/s (domestik 0,0234 m³/s; pertanian 0,4252 m³/s; industri 0,1811 m³/s), dengan Water Availability Ratio (WAR) 1,427. Analisis RRV menghasilkan Indeks Keberlanjutan DAS (IKDAS) sebesar 0,85 (sangat baik), didukung oleh keandalan tinggi (1,0), ketahanan baik (0,84) dengan tutupan hutan 87,9%, namun masih menghadapi kerentanan signifikan (0,65) terutama akibat tingkat erosi tinggi (385,6 ton/ha/tahun) dan area rawan banjir (34,63%). Rekomendasi pengelolaan meliputi teknik konservasi tanah-air, sistem peringatan dini banjir, perluasan zona riparian, dan penguatan kelembagaan pengelolaan kolaboratif untuk mengintegrasikan kepentingan berbagai pemangku kepentingan. Pendekatan RRV terbukti efektif untuk evaluasi komprehensif kondisi DAS dan perumusan prioritas intervensi strategis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it