MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6907778881 · doi:10.25318/1310001901-fra

Espérance de vie en fonction de la santé, à la naissance et à 65 ans, selon le sexe et le groupe de revenu, Canada et provinces, inactif

2019· dataset· fr· W6907778881 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueStatistics Canada Dissemination · 2019
Typedataset
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLimitingMedical screeningGender identityResearch methodology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce tableau contient 1408 séries, avec des données pour les années 2001 - 2001 (il n'y a pas nécessairement de données pour toutes les années pour l'ensemble des combinaisons). Ce tableau contient des données telles que décrites par les dimensions suivantes (les combinaisons ne sont pas toutes disponibles): Géographie (11 éléments: Canada;Île-du-Prince-Édouard;Nouvelle-Écosse;Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador ...), Groupe d'âge (2 éléments: À la naissance; À 65 ans ...), Sexe (2 éléments: Hommes; Femmes ...), Groupe de revenu (4 éléments: Tous les groupes de revenu; Groupe de revenu; tercile 1 (le plus faible);Groupe de revenu; tercile 3 (le plus élevé);Groupe de revenu; tercile 2 (milieu) ...), Caractéristiques (8 éléments: Espérance de vie en fonction de la santé; Limite inférieure de l'intervalle de confiance de 95 %; espérance de vie en fonction de la santé; Coefficient de variation pour l'espérance de vie en fonction de la santé; Limite supérieure de l'intervalle de confiance de 95 %; espérance de vie en fonction de la santé ...).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStatistics Canada Dissemination→French-language works237,207→