MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6907817824 · doi:10.25446/oxford.13877966

E06037: Sophronius of Jerusalem, in his Miracles of the Saints Cyrus and John, recounts how *Kyros and Ioannes/Cyrus and John (physician and soldier, martyrs of Egypt, S00406) healed a certain Isidoros from a pulmonary disease at their shrine at Menouthis (near Alexandria, Lower Egypt). Written in Greek in Alexandria, 610/615.

2018· other· en· W6907817824 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Oxford · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaithAdmirationQuarter (Canadian coin)KingdomMiracleMagistrateAdoration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sophronius of Jerusalem, The Miracles of Saints Cyrus and John, 4<br><br>Summary:<br><br>There was a certain Isidoros who came from Maioumas, not the Maioumas of Gaza, but that of Alexandria. The Alexandrian Maioumas is located on the ancient island of Pharos which is now considered a quarter of Alexandria; in spite of the fact that it has been united to the city, it still keeps its previous name of Maioumas.<br><br>This Isidoros was in a very bad state. His lung tormented him so badly that he already expected that death would be the remedy for his ordeal, since this organ had rotted, and he expectorated blood and phlegm. He was conscious that there was no more hope for his recovery among people. He had, however, a faith in saints Cyrus and John that might cast mountains into the sea and make the dead arise from their tombs (because the Saviour had made the faith so potent), so he left the city and went to the martyrs' sanctuary.<br><br>The martyrs, in admiration for his faith, appeared to him not in a dream, but in a waking vision (ouk onar all' hypar auto paraphainontai). They gave him a piece of lemon (kitrou meros) and commanded him to eat it immediately. However, he took the martyrs for members of the public in the sanctuary. Having taken the lemon with pleasure, he started to eat it willingly, but with the last bite of it he began to vomit. This way, he got rid of the worm that was devouring his lung and regained his health.<br><br>Text: Fernández Marcos 1976, lightly modified in the light of Gascou 2007. Summary: J. Doroszewska.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of OxfordFrench-language works237,207