MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6907853756 · doi:10.25446/oxford.25920286

Private Laurance Leishman, Italy 1944

2024· other· en· W6907853756 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfantryArtilleryGermanBattleFront (military)IrishQuarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5339249 Private Laurence Leishman, a pre-war territorial soldier in the 5th (Hackney) Battalion, Royal Berkshire Regiment, was mobilised in 1939. Volunteered for service with the independent companies in 1940 and served with Number 3 independent company under Colonel Newman, V.C. in the Norwegian campaign. Drafted to the Middle East as a replacement in 1943. Joined 13 Platoon, C Company, 10th Royal Berkshire Regiment, 168th Brigade, 56th (London) Division just after the Salerno landings. Took part in the Battles of Monte Camino and Monte Damino.The Brigade was pulled from the front line on 30 January 1944 and arrived at Anzio via Landing Ship Tanks (LSTs) on 2 February 1944. By 6 February the brigade had moved into defensive positions with the 1st London Irish Rifles around Aprilla (the factory) and the 10th Royal Berkshires around a crossroads approximately 1.5 miles east of the factory, whilst the 1st London Scottish were the Brigade reserve. The German Battle Group Graser was tasked with capturing the ground held by the 168th Brigade. Capturing this ground would achieve two objectives: firstly to trap the British 1st Division and prevent its withdrawal; and secondly, to capture the jump-off point for the subsequent Operation Fischfang, the third largest German counter-attack in the West after Operation Wacht am Rhein (Battle of the Bulge) and Operation Nordwind. Approximately 15,000 German infantry with tank and artillery support were to attack the rifle companies of two Battalions (1st London Irish Rifles and 10th Royal Berkshires) comprising about 400 men each. German attacks against the Brigade positions (the fourth largest German counter-attack in the West) began on the morning of 7 February and continued for 72 hours, taking place in almost non-stop heavy rain. The attacks comprised of waves of infantry, continuous artillery bombardment, tank attacks as well as remote control 'Goliath' disposable demolition vehicles. Much of the fighting was hand to hand. Eventually the German troops surrounded the Berkshire's positions and casualties were such that surrender was the only option. Private Leishman, along with seven other survivors from B and C companies and two Royal Engineer Sappers, were taken prisoner by German Fallschirmjäger (paratroopers). All that was left of the Royal Berkshires were 40 men, most of whom were members of the battalion HQ. Private Leishman remained as a POW for the remainder of the war, taking part in the long march of January 1945 when the Germans evacuated Allied prisoners-of-war away from the advancing Soviet army.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8410.698

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→