Finite Element Method (FEM) Modeling of Hopper Flow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hopper systems of different shapes and sizes are widely used in bulk solids industries to store and further process the particulate material. Poor hopper design causes variety of problems and results in wastage of resources. This dissertation investigates the applicability of finite element method (FEM) based continuum modeling in predicting flow characteristics of particulate materials discharging through hopper system. Throughout the years, FEM has been implemented to simulate the shear failure of particulate materials such as sand, glass beads, and pharmaceutical powders. The FEM framework is based on the underlying constitutive model. Different constitutive models are available in the literature to govern the behavior of particulate materials. These models differ in their complexity, ease of implementation, and have specific strengths and limitations. This work thoroughly investigates the elasto-plastic constitutive models available in the commercial software Abaqus in the context of hopper flow of particulate materials. The thesis consists of three major parts, first part deals with FEM modeling of cohesionless particulate materials and corresponding verification of the hopper flow characteristics through comparison to analytical theories and empirical correlations. The second part presents quantitative comparison of FEM predicted flow characteristics to experimental results for Ottawa sand discharging through concentric and eccentric bins. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) experiments are conducted on a laboratory-scale bin to quantify different flow characteristics. The last part deals with cohesive particulate materials and presents a novel FEM approach for predicting the critical hopper outlet opening to ensure uninterrupted discharge of the stored material. This thesis concludes that the FEM modeling based on simple elasto-plastic constitutive model proves useful in predicting different hopper flow characteristics of particulate materials. The accuracy of FEM modeling depends on detailed material characterization and corresponding implementation in Abaqus. Some modifications need to be made in the elasto-plastic constitutive models to accurately represent the bulk material behavior. The ideas presented in this thesis can be applied to FEM modeling of other processing equipment such as the rotating drum, screw-feeder, rotating blender/mixer etc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".