MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6907954457 · doi:10.25446/oxford.25923157

Last Day of Gunner Ronald Taylor

2024· other· en· W6907954457 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNavyGermanWelshQuarter (Canadian coin)Crew

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ronald Taylor was born in a small Welsh village, Talywain, in 1922. He was the first born of six boys to Dorothy and Wilfred Taylor. Ronald had just turned 20 years old when he joined the Royal Navy in March 1942. He was trained as a Gunner. Before he went to sea he returned home to his family for a short visit. My father, who was 10 years old at the time, recalled walking with Ronald back to the village train station carrying his cloth rucksack and on saying goodbye Ronald gave him a piece of his lapel string to keep safe till he returned. On returning to Portsmouth Ronald served on the ship Glendower, the Wellesley and finally he boarded the Otina in December 1942. This ship was part of a convoy of 43 ships, which was part of the British escort group B7 consisting of the Destroyers Firedrake and Ripley and the corvettes Sunflower, Loosestrife, Alsima and Pink. They were travelling through the North Atlantic, from Belfast to New York. A quarter of the way through their journey they were stalked by a German "Wolf Pack" ( a group of German submarines). On the night of the 21st December at 21.00 hours his ship was torpedoed twice and within 45 minutes the ship sank killing all 60 crew members. Ronald was one of seven Royal Navy Gunners on board.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1730.067

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→