Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tumulus and grave much as the last; coffin much burnt: the bones almost gone. Near the neck were six slender silver rings, with sliding knots, as before: seven beads of baked earth, of different colours, as before: as also an amethyst drop of an ear-ring, as at No. 6, and a beautiful golden amulet, or ornament for the neck [M 6160]. The face of it is elegantly corded with a sort of double cross, one of which is what the heralds term furchée; the other is a plain one. In the centre is a blue stone: I take it to be an hyacinth. It is full one and a quarter inch broad; and has a loop of the same metal to pass a string through: it weighs 02dwt. 18gr. Near the hips was a brass box [M 6159], very like our common dredging boxes. It is two and a quarter inches high; two inches diameter; and, both top and sides, very full of small holes.[1] It was, doubtless, designed to hold perfumes. When found, it was full of some rotten dark-coloured substance, which, together with the bottom (which was also full of holes), fell out, on its removal from its place: it had no smell: I count it a great curiosity. Here was, also, a brass shank of a small buckle. A woman's grave.[1]These are not holes, but raised dots made by punching the inner side of the metal. The box itself appears to have been intended for pins, needles, and such small implements used for female attire.- C.R.S.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.841 | 0.684 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".