MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6907992577 · doi:10.25446/oxford.25935658

Rusty's War: Courage in the Clouds

2024· other· en· W6907992577 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrewCourageAdversaryDutyCrashShot (pellet)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Russell, or as he is more commonly called Rusty, flew Lancaster Bombers on numerous raids over Europe including the 1000 bomber raids.Firstly, he did not have any fear or superstitions as he is sure he had his father’s good luck. He joined the RAF at seventeen and his father was in the Navy. He became a pilot flying Lancaster Bombers.On some of the raids, there were higher losses amongst the British Bombers than on others, depending on the ground defences as well as the night fighters. On one raid of 240 aircrafts, they lost 83 over enemy territory after flying a long straight leg of the raid. On another, only 26 aircrafts were sent and they lost 7 aircrafts.There were also mid-air collisions between our aircrafts as we were flying close formations.The one time we had the bomb aimers controls cut through by the props of another aircraft below but we carried on. On another occasion, all the hydraulics to the Pilots controls were cut and so he asked the crew if they should continue or turn back and they all asked to continue, which is what they did and eventually dropped their bomb load and managed to turn the aircraft round and slowly flew back to the UK fearful of being "picked" off. They managed to get the aircraft back over the English coast and crash landed the aircraft BUT saved the crew!After reaching 30 operational missions, he went to Canada to train for a special duty squadron.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0250.017
Scholarly communication0.0180.015
Open science0.0010.011
Research integrity0.0050.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→