University of Southern California and Texas, 1955
Bibliographic record
Abstract
24 images. University of Southern California and Texas, 30 September 1955. Sports. (Sleeve reads: SP 11670).; Caption slip reads: "Photographer: Al Arnone. Assignment: USC vs Texas. 1st quarter -- Al#1: Arnett makes 10 yds. 2nd quarter -- Al#11: N.G. Al#12: Texas incomplete pass in end zone. Al#9: USC 2nd TD. 3rd quarter -- Al#13: Texas 1st TD. 4th quarter -- Al#17: USC 3rd TD".; Other caption slip reads: "Photographer: Jensen. Date: 1955-09-30. Assignment: USC vs Texas, 1st quarter -- J-42: 40 SC 12 yd gain and 1st down. J-43: 24 Texas to 18 yd line. 2nd quarter -- J-46: 26 SC 9 yd gain. J-47: 26 SC made 1st down. J-50: 42 SC to Texas 9 yd line before 2nd TD. 3rd quarter -- J-62: 28 Texas pass to 24 fd SC 4 yd line before TD".; Other caption slip reads: "Photographer: Miller. Date: 11-26. Assignment: SC -- ND. 2nd quarter: LM6: SC fake field goal. Pass to Arnett makes 1st down on 9 yd line - st up TD. LM7: Arnett makes 3rd SC TD from 10 yd line. LM8: NG".; Other caption slip reads: "Photographer: Monte[verde]. Assignment: SC vs Texas. 1st quarter -- 13: 46 Texas tackled by 40 SC. Lost 4 yds on 42 yd line. 14: 26 SC makes 11 yds. Next play 1st down. 47: 26 SC tackled by 80 Texas on 34 yds. Penalty on play". 48: 12 SC tackled then fumble just after picture, recovered by SC on 21 yd line. 19: 26 SC tackled on 5 yd line by 44 Texas and 46. Next play 1st SC TD. 20: 46 Texas tackled on 33 yd line by entire SC squad. 21: 20 SC tackled by 40 Texas on 39 yd line just before 1st quarter gun. 2nd quarter -- 22: NG. 11: 11 Texas tackled by 12 SC on 14 yd line of SC. 12: 24 Texas pass in end zone almost intercepted by 26 SC. 29: 42 SC making 2nd SC TD. 3rd quarter -- 40: 1st Texas TD. 24 Texas tackled by 26 SC. 4th quarter -- 4: 21 Texas caught on their own 1 yd line. 63 SC & 54 made tackle. 18: 3rd SC TD by 40".; Supplementary material includes: "Probable starting lineup for University of Texas and Southern California. (For complete list, see original)".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.069 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".