MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6908175117 · doi:10.25656/01:16095

L’éducation à l’épreuve des flux migratoires dans les destinations de langue française. La situation des enfants sans-papiers en France et au Québec

2018· article· fr· W6908175117 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuepeDOCS · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Exile Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDestinationsOrder (exchange)JurisdictionProduct (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La migration remet en question le droit à l’éducation et les approches des pays sont différentes. Cet article analyse la situation du droit à l’éducation pour les destinations francophones les plus recherchées, à savoir la France et le Québec. Accès gratuity à l’enseignement et égalité des chances, intérêt supérieur de l’enfant et respect des engagements internationaux façonnent le paysage du droit à l’éducation. L’article note que la législation française respecte entièrement le droit à l’éducation, alors que pour le Québec, le cadre législatif et le statut ambigu de résident constituent les principaux obstacles aux droits des enfants migrants. L’article peut également enrichir les réflexions des chercheurs des pays ayant un niveau élevé de migration tels que le Royaume-Uni ou la Suisse. (DIPF/Orig.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it