MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6908226837 · doi:10.25592/uhhfdm.16324

Kanada 2023: die verheerendsten Waldbrände seit Beobachtungsbeginn

2024· article· en· W6908226837 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversität Hamburg · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaigaClimate changeDeciduousBorealGlobal warmingVegetation (pathology)Sustainable development

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<em><strong>Canada 2023: the most devastating forest fires in the history of the country: </strong></em>The Canadian wildfires of 2023 have reached an unprecedented dimension, affecting the entire country from the Pacific to the Atlantic. The cause was an exceptional fire weather due to global warming, with very high temperatures already in spring, extreme drought and strong winds. The consequences of these and future forest fires, in conjunction with climate change, will greatly change Canadian forests, with destruction mainly in the southern part of the boreal forest belt and growth with a higher proportion of deciduous trees in the northern part. Adaptation measures could include preventive firefighting, the promotion of mixed forests and sustainable wood use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.506
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversität HamburgSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207