MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6908414163 · doi:10.25946/25484908

Determining Self While Being Pushed, Pulled and Shaped at the Cultural Interface: The Post-Schooling Transition Experiences of Cape York Indigenous Boarding School Graduates

2024· dissertation· en· W6908414163 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousTransformative learningSituational ethicsCapeCareer PathwaysTracking (education)MetisGrounded theory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Completion of year 12 is known to enhance employment prospects and improve economic, health and wellbeing outcomes. For most Indigenous young people from remote communities in Cape York, Far North Queensland, access to a comprehensive secondary education is only possible by moving away from family and Country to attend boarding school. This poses significant challenges and requires compromises that have far reaching implications. Nationally, only 41.7% of very remote-dwelling Indigenous young people complete year 12 or the equivalent. Growing research and ensuing debates exist about the benefits and costs of the boarding school experience for remote Indigenous students, yet there remains limited research regarding one of the key purported benefits – that of enhanced post-schooling pathways for those who do complete year 12. This study examined the experiences of 56 of 142 Cape York Indigenous young people who graduated from boarding school between 2013 and 2018. Through centralising their voices, it mapped their pathways up to six years post-completion, and explored the process by which they navigated the transition from year 12 completion into pathways beyond school. Utilising a decolonizing approach and operating within transformative and constructivist paradigms this mixed-methods study, encompassed grounded theory based on semi-structured yarns with supplementary components consisting of a questionnaire (descriptively analysed) and situational analysis. Determining what constituted a successful transition was difficult however, understanding that aspirations were individually and collectively intertwined, multi-dimensional, evolved over time and that connection to family, community, culture and Country played a significant role in how transitions were imagined and enacted was significant. This not only provided a holistic lens to view transitions but strengthened the importance of ensuring strong outcomes were achieved. The grounded theory presented in this thesis highlighted that navigating post-schooling transitions was a complex and ongoing process, with the core process being: determining self while being pushed, pulled and shaped at the cultural interface. Five situational conditions were found to significantly influence transition experiences: 1) the growing self; 2) the socio-cultural tug of war; 3) geographical tensions; 4) influencing supports and resources; and 5) significant and defining events. In response, young people utilised five strategies to inform their transition decisions: 1) cross-cultural sensemaking; 2) connecting; 3) adapting, applying and building capabilities; 4) keeping the flow; and 5) weighing up their options. This thesis unpacks the complex nature of this process across three transition phases. Overall, graduates believed year 12 attainment had benefited their ability to engage in employment, training or study and reported high levels of overall life satisfaction. Further, they were proud of their achievements, saw themselves as role models in their communities and continued to be driven by a desire to contribute to the collective good of their communities. However, a high proportion of graduates did not experience the full benefits expected through year 12 completion. Instead, many (particularly females) experienced high levels of part-time, low-wage and/or fractured employment upon leaving school and reported lower satisfaction with their employment opportunities and financial situations. Transitions were likely to be strengthened when schools drew on young people’s strengths, provided a culturally responsive education linked to their values, maintained high expectations and created opportunities that nurtured aspirations and built capabilities. Creating a transition exit strategy regardless of whether graduates returned home or remained away was essential. Further, having a strong network of supports, including family or other significant mentors, was critical across all transition phases. Graduates were more likely to ‘fall through the gaps’ when aspirations were undefined prior to leaving school, support networks were lacking, and opportunities were limited or required difficult compromises such as moving away from their communities. Despite over half of graduates returning home after school completion, schools were reported to focus support predominantly on those following university pathways. Consequently, many graduates left school without a clear transition plan and were left to negotiate their transitions independently or with their families. This initial 12 months beyond school was seen as a time of increased vulnerability. Findings suggest that current post-schooling transition practices and systems, both at school and beyond, are often ad hoc and fail to adequately meet the unique needs and aspirations of remote-dwelling Indigenous graduates. Given the investment required for these young people to navigate a boarding school education, it seems imperative that current approaches be transformed to enable greater success and satisfaction. This study identified a range of conditions and strategies that will ensure programs are relevant and inclusive of Cape York graduates’ worldviews and aspirations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.012
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→