An agricultural renaissance in Africa : seizing opportunities in global agricultural trade
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Africa is at a pivotal moment in its agricultural evolution. It is poised to harness its vast potential and emerge as a prominent player in the global food supply chain. With initiatives like the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) in place, the continent has a unique opportunity to drive economic growth, enhance food security, and foster sustainable development with agricultural trade. However, Africa faces significant challenges, including low productivity, inadequate infrastructure, and trade barriers, which hinder intra-Africa agricultural trade and limit the continent's participation in the global market. Despite these challenges, Africa can learn lessons from successful agricultural models in other continents. By examining the experiences of regions like the European Union (EU), the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), and the Association of South east Asian Nations (ASEAN), Africa can develop tailored strategies to overcome barriers to intraAfrica agricultural trade and maximise the benefit of agricultural transformation. Moreover, fostering regional cooperation and integration, resolving conflict, harmonising trade policies, and investing in infrastructure are essential steps towards unlocking Africa's agricultural trade potential. By implementing these policies, Africa can overcome barriers to intra-Africa agricultural trade and enhance its global competitiveness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".