Dyrektywa w sprawie dzieł osieroconych i jej znaczenie dla polskiego prawa autorskiego
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper discusses the impact of the Directive on certain permitted uses of orphan works on the Polish legal system. The author first presents the solutions applied in the foreign legal systems (US, Canada and the UK ). Thereafter, the paper analyzes the question whether the system employed in the Directive, that involves a thorough search for entities with copyrights as a precondition for using those works, constitutes the right approach. The author claims that such procedure may not be appropriate in the case of orphan work with several authors, as it is the case in the European Union. The author argues that a better way of addressing the problem would be to entrust the management of orphan works with specialized entities that would pay remuneration to parties entitled to copyright once they emerge. The Polish Copyright Act should provide for such a procedure and the author advocates an appropriate implementation of the Directive into the Polish law.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it