Souffrance au travail dans les salles de rédaction: une comparaison entre Radio-Canada et Québecor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose une analyse comparative de la souffrance au travail se produisant chez deux des plus grandes institutions médiatiques du Canada : le service public Radio-Canada et le conglomérat médiatique privé Québecor. Chez Radio-Canada, la souffrance au travail est étroitement associée à la montée de la gestion néolibérale, cette dernière accentuant le fossé entre le travail prescrit et le travail réel. Chez Québecor, la souffrance au travail est plutôt associée à la division extrême du travail mise en scène par le processus de convergence. Dans les deux cas, le collectif de travail est fragmenté en une lutte individuelle des journalistes entre eux, ce qui provoque une diminution du pouvoir d’agir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it