Data Sheet 7_Genomic analysis of the 2017 Aotearoa New Zealand outbreak of Mycoplasma bovis and its position within the global population structure.csv
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2017 an outbreak of Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis), an infectious agent of cattle, was identified in Aotearoa New Zealand. This study characterizes the genomic population structure of the outbreak in New Zealand and compares it with the known global population structure using multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and genomic analysis. The New Zealand outbreak strain was MLST genotyped as ST21. A comprehensive collection of 840 genomes from the New Zealand outbreak showed a pattern of clonal expansion when characterized by MLST, core genome MLST (cgMLST) and whole genome MLST (wgMLST). A lineage of genomes was found with no in silico identifiable pta2 locus, a housekeeping gene used in the MLST scheme. We compared a sample set of 40 New Zealand genomes to 47 genomes from other countries. This group had 79 ST21 genomes and eight genomes that were single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variants within the MLST loci of ST21. Two of the 47 international genomes showed signs of extensive unique recombination. Unique alleles in six genes were identified as present only in the New Zealand genomes. These novel variants were in the genes; haeIIIM encoding for cytosine-specific methyltransferase, cysC encoding for cysteinyl tRNA synthetase, era encoding for GTPase Era, metK encoding for S-adenosylmethionine synthase, parE encoding for DNA topoisomerase, and hisS encoding for histidine-tRNA ligase. This finding could be due to a population bottleneck, genetic drift, or positive selection. The same sample set of 40 New Zealand genomes were compared using MLST to 404 genomes from 15 other countries and 11 genomes without a known country. A FastBAPS analysis of 455 genomes showed a global population structure with 11 clusters. Some countries, such as Canada, Denmark and Australia contained both internally closely related genomes and some genomes that were more closely related to genomes found in other countries. Our results support the need for Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) as well as MLST genotyping in M. bovis outbreaks. They also support the importance of understanding the national and international movement patterns of cattle and their genetic material, as possible routes of transmission, when managing the spread of M. bovis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".