MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Table1_Soil CO2 Emission Largely Dominates the Total Ecosystem CO2 Emission at Canadian Boreal Forest.DOCX

2022· dataset· en· W6908742142 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Poetry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBorealEcosystemCarbon cycleSoil carbonTaigaEcosystem respirationDecompositionLitterPermafrostSoil respiration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>The natural carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emission from the ecosystem, also termed as the ecosystem respiration (R<sub>eco</sub>), is the primary natural source of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>. The contemporary models rely on empirical functions to represent decomposition of litter with multiple soil carbon pools decaying at different rates in estimating R<sub>eco</sub> variations and its partitioning into autotrophic (R<sub>a</sub>) (originating from plants) and heterotrophic (originating mostly from microorganisms) respiration (R<sub>h</sub>) in relation to variation in temperature and soil water content. Microbially-mediated litter decomposition scheme representation are not very popular yet. However, microbial enzymatic processes play integral role in litter as well as soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition. Here we developed a mechanistic model comprising of multiple hydro-biogeochemical modules in the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) code to explicitly incorporate microbial-enzymatic litter decomposition and decomposition of SOM for separately estimating regional-scale R<sub>a</sub>, R<sub>h</sub> and R<sub>eco</sub>. Modeled annual mean R<sub>eco</sub> values are found varying from 1,600 to 8,200 kg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> in 2000–2013 within the boreal forest covered sub-basins of the Athabasca River Basin (ARB), Canada. While, for the 2000–2013 period, the annual mean R<sub>a</sub>, R<sub>h</sub> and soil CO<sub>2</sub> emission (R<sub>s</sub>) are varying within 800–6,000 kg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, 700–4,200 kg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> and 1,200–5,000 kg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. R<sub>s</sub> generally dominates R<sub>eco</sub> with nearly 60–90% contribution in most of the sub-basins in ARB. The model estimates corroborate well with the site-scale and satellite-based estimates reported at similar land use and climatic regions. Mechanistic modeling of R<sub>eco</sub> and its components are critical to understanding future climate change feedbacks and to help reduce uncertainties particularly in the boreal and subarctic regions that has huge soil carbon store.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8880.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicFrench Literature and PoetryFrench-language works237,207