Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
VenueHigh-Energy Physics Literature Database (CERN, DESY, Fermilab, IHEP, and SLAC) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTechnology, Environment, Urban Planning
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungScience and Technology Facilities CouncilBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFondation Partager le SavoirEuropean Social FundRoyal SocietyCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueShota Rustaveli National Science FoundationJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Research Center "Kurchatov Institute"European Regional Development FundBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundMax-Planck-GesellschaftCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueIsrael Science FoundationComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaTürkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftGeneralitat de CatalunyaGeneralitat ValencianaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesAustrian Science FundIsraeli Centers for Research ExcellenceU.S. Department of EnergyOntario Innovation TrustNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEuropean CommissionLeverhulme TrustFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekAgence Nationale de la RechercheServices Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyNational Science FoundationCompute CanadaAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungTRIUMFCanarieCentres de Recerca de CatalunyaCERNDanmarks Grundforskningsfond
KeywordsLarge Hadron ColliderHiggs bosonAtlas (anatomy)LuminosityCutoffBranching fractionPhotonAtlas detectorStandard Model (mathematical formulation)
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexSearches for new phenomena in high-mass diphoton final states with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC are presented. The analysis is based on pp collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36.7 fb$^{−1}$ at a centre-of-mass energy $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV recorded in 2015 and 2016. Searches are performed for resonances with spin 0, as predicted by theories with an extended Higgs sector, and for resonances with spin 2, using a warped extra-dimension model as a benchmark model, as well as for non-resonant signals, assuming a large extra-dimension scenario. No significant deviation from the Standard Model is observed. Upper limits are placed on the production cross section times branching ratio to two photons as a function of the resonance mass. In addition, lower limits are set on the ultraviolet cutoff scale in the large extra-dimensions model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
