MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6909452260 · doi:10.35010/ecuad:15057

I Learnt What Care Means From A Stranger

2019· article· en· W6909452260 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPosthumanist Ethics and Activism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Embodied cognitionCuriosityEmpathyMeaning (existential)Perspective (graphical)WitnessStorytellingGesture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I envision the world as an intricate labyrinth of stories, where with each encounter we have the opportunity to learn from the lived experiences of others. The perplexities of human existence and a curiosity for understanding and sharing perspective is what drives my artistic practice as a visual storyteller, multidisciplinary maker, and social practitioner. My practice looks at storytelling as a catalyst for changing the perspective of another through an exploration of the role of care in our everyday lives and the stories we carry with us. I work towards understanding gestures of care and their public, social, domestic, unseen, racialized and distributed forms as a core part of my artistic practice. I bear witness to personal anecdotes and the oral histories of others to acknowledge various articulations of care expressed through lived experience, which we manifest physically through the form of material exploration. I see this act as increasingly necessary in our current socio-political environment—one built on the foundations of ‘imperialist white-supremacist capitalist patriarchy’ (1) as Author Bell Hooks describes in Understanding Patriarchy. However, in this context, gestures of care, no matter how carefully studied or attended to, may not be enough, and so I have developed a practice of Radical Care. In this document I define Radical Care as an embodied protest and methodology that aims to listen and be present with the unknowable other, in an embrace of vulnerability and discomfort to better understand difference. I define this need as a brown body in a white context and hope to expand empathy into support for others as I attempt to build a space for care, comfort, community and ultimately a sense of belonging. This is done by hosting gatherings, through the form of a workshop, interactive installation or sculpture, within which others are able to self-identify as wanting to participate in this particular discourse. The work stems from conversations that unfold through a series of gestures such as storytelling, listening and making to form generative environments for dialogue and exchange. Across my work, I use clay as a co-facilitator to access the memories we store in relation to tangible objects, places or people, and to extend that dialogue through material exploration, which moves beyond the need for verbal communication or common language. Materially and metaphorically, clay embodies the underlying tendencies of radical care, offering a material record of conversations and vulnerabilities that are needed to better understand the people I work with in my projects. This document works towards situating and contextualising this practice by tracing my two year journey and relocation to Vancouver, BC from Bangalore, India. It also dissects my relationship with social practice, workshops, sculpture and aesthetics in the contemporary art discourse. As I define decisions I make and reflect on how they function in the case of four specific works that resulted from the MFA program at Emily Carr; Objects of Place, Where Are You From, What Do We Owe To Each Other and Listening Vessels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.031
Scholarly communication0.0120.015
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0050.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)Same topicPosthumanist Ethics and ActivismFrench-language works237,207