PSID data extract for "Household Return Heterogeneity in the United States"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<span>This package provides the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) data extract used by Snudden (2024b) in the paper titled “Idiosyncratic Asset Return and Wage Risk of US Households” in <i>Economic Inquiry. </i> The extract is intended to be used in conjunction with the replication code provided by Snudden (2024a), titled “ECIN Replication Package for “Idiosyncratic Asset Return and Wage Risk of US Households.”” The extract was also used for Snudden (2024c) titled “Leverage and Rate of Return Heterogeneity among U.S. Households,” and Snudden (2019) titled “Household Return Heterogeneity in the United States”. The extract uses data from the 1999–2019 waves and was downloaded December 14, 2021 @ 12:31:43. Data is subject to a redistribution restriction but can be freely downloaded. </span>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.029 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".