MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

外线不缝合对皮肤切口愈合的影响的前瞻性自身对照临床试验

2024· article· en· W6910057581 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSurgical Sutures and Adhesives
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibrous jointDehiscenceShouldersResectionProspective cohort studyAbdomenWound dehiscence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of whether to apply the external suture after internal suture on skin incision healing. METHODS: This study was a prospective self-controlled clinical trial. From November 2020 to September 2021, 49 patients who underwent skin resection surgery and met the inclusion criteria were admitted to Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, including 39 females and 10 males, aged 18 to 55 years. The surgical sites included the upper limbs (17 cases), lower limbs (2 cases), shoulders (3 cases), neck (8 cases), abdomen (8 cases), chest (10 cases), and back (1 case). The surgical incision of each patient was divided equally into the external suture segment (with internal suture and external suture) and the external sutureless segment (with internal suture only) using the random sequence method. On the day of suture removal and at the 1(st) month of follow-up after surgery, the incision dehiscence was observed. At the 12(th) month of follow-up after surgery, the scar hyperplasia was observed and the scar hyperplasia rate of the incision was calculated. At the 6(th) and 12(th) months of follow-up after surgery, the scar width of incision was measured. At the 1(st), 6(th), and 12(th) months of follow-up after surgery, the Vancouver scar scale (VSS) was used to assess scar condition of the incision in terms of color, thickness, vascularization, and pliability, and the total score was calculated. The number of patients corresponding to the VSS score in the 1(st) and 12(th) months of follow-up after surgery was 41 and 46, respectively, while the number of patients corresponding to other indicators was 49. RESULTS: On the day of suture removal and at the 1(st) month of follow-up after surgery, no dehiscence was observed in either the external suture segment or external sutureless segment of any patient's surgical incision. At the 12(th) month of follow-up after surgery, the scar hyperplasia rate in the external suture segment was 2.04% (1/49), which was not significantly different from 4.08% (2/49) in the external sutureless segment (P > 0.05). At the 6(th) and 12(th) months of follow-up after surgery, the scar widths in the external sutureless segment of incision were 1.48 (1.01, 1.91) and 1.41 (1.13, 1.93) mm, respectively, which were not significantly different from 1.38 (1.00, 1.94) and 1.45 (1.17, 1.84) mm in the external suture segment (with Z values of 191.00 and 152.00, respectively, P > 0.05). At the 1(st), 6(th), and 12(th) months of follow-up after surgery, there were no statistically significant differences either in scores of scar color, thickness, vascularization, pliability, or in the total VSS score of the incision scar between the external suture segment and the external sutureless segment (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: After skin incision is finely sutured internally with tension reduction, the presence or absence of external suture has no significant effect on the healing of the incision and the appearance of postoperative scar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.698
Threshold uncertainty score0.928

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed CentralSame topicSurgical Sutures and AdhesivesFrench-language works237,207