MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6910137586 · doi:10.4224/20378356

Integration of machine vision and virtual reality for computer-assisted micro assembly

2007· report· en· W6910137586 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2007
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVRMLVirtual realityAutomationBlock (permutation group theory)Machine visionAugmented realitySection (typography)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report describes the design and implementation of machine vision and virtual reality modules for 'peg-in-a-hole' assembly that involves operations such as picking pins from holes in a block and inserting pins in desired locations in empty holes. The first part of the report describes technical issues that need to be addressed to achieve full automation of 'peg in a hole' assembly including alternative solutions and their advantages and drawbacks. The second part explains LabVIEW® (laboratory virtual instrumentation engineering workbench) and describes how to execute the program. The last section describes the procedure for creating and using a VRML (virtual reality modeling language) in labVIEW.®

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARC→French-language works237,207→