MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6910173551 · doi:10.37425/gqxxsf23

Predictors of Birth Weight Among Infants in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya

2024· article· en· W6910173551 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueEast African Journal of Science Technology and Innovation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersInternational Union of Nutritional Sciences
KeywordsBirth weightPregnancyLow birth weightGestationMarital statusReferralParity (physics)Multivariate analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Birth weight is a predictor of survival rate among neonates and a marker of neonatal and maternal nutrition and health. Low birth weight is associated with both short-term and long-term consequences for neonates that include risk for chronic diseases later in life. This study determined the prevalence of low birth weight as well as factors associated with birth weight in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. This was a retrospective study in which health records of 970 mothers who delivered at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital in Kenya were evaluated. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and linear regression modelling. The mean birth weight (BW) was 3.0±0.6 kg and the prevalence of low birth weight was 13.5%. The mothers’ mean age (years) was 26.0±5.8 with a median of 25 (range:14-46) years. Factors associated with low birth weight were: employment status, marital status, sex of the child, gestation, presence of deformity and pregnancy outcome. In the final multivariate linear regression model, mean infant BW reduced by 15.1% when the mother was unemployed compared to 8.7% for those who were formally employed. Infants born via CS had 9.6% higher BW than those born vaginally. BW reduced by 15.5% when the infant was female compared with those who were male. There was an increase in the infant BW by 46.0% when infant had no deformity. The relationship between the gestation period at delivery and infant BW depended on the pregnancy outcome. Factors associated with low birth weight were employment status, marital status, sex of the child, gestation period, presence of deformity and pregnancy outcome. Interventions aiming at improving BW and reducing the prevalence of LBW should consider these factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0070.010
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEast African Journal of Science Technology and InnovationSame topicGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207