MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6910223558 · doi:10.4224/crm.2017.aleu-1

ALEU-1: Certified Reference Material for L-leucine

2017· other· en· W6910223558 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueNRC Digital Repository · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFraction (chemistry)Certified reference materialsMass fractionCertificationImpurity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ALEU-1 is a pure substance certified reference material (CRM) for L-leucine. This material, distributed in 100 mg units, is intended for instrument calibration, method development, and validation for the quantitation of L-leucine and DL-leucine mixtures. Certified values for the mass fraction of L-leucine and DL-leucine mixture in ALEU-1 has been established. Information values for the mass fraction of D-leucine and other amino acids related minor impurities are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.059

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNRC Digital RepositoryFrench-language works237,207