Vingt ans de créations nues au Québec. Entretien avec Daniel Léveillé
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette conversation avec le chorégraphe montréalais Daniel Léveillé met en exergue les enjeux de la nudité en danse contemporaine. Si le corps nu est usuel sur les plateaux scéniques, il pose néanmoins des défis à la création. La discussion en interroge les usages, significations, représentations, l’association aux notions d’intimité et de sexualité, de gêne et de pudeur. Le phénomène du nu est questionné depuis le point de vue chorégraphique, donnant voix aux intentions du chorégraphe. Les politiques de réception sont également évoquées, soulignant la diversité des modes de réception à l’échelle internationale. Enfin, l’exhibition du nu est pensée dans son enchevêtrement avec d’autres médias, tels que la lumière, le geste et l’espace.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".