MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6910274446 · doi:10.48448/dtwq-6t41

Quantification of Sensitivity and Specificity in a Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Diagnostic Assay for Pathogenic Bacteria Detection and Classification

2021· other· en· W6910274446 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueUnderline Science Inc. · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaser-induced breakdown spectroscopyFiltration (mathematics)BacteriaPathogenic bacteriaAnalytical Chemistry (journal)SpectroscopyBacterial taxonomyChemometrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is a laser-based spectrochemical technique that allows a near-instantaneous measurement of the elemental composition of a target by making time-resolved spectroscopic analyses of laser-induced ablation plasmas. Utilizing nanosecond laser pulses and a broadband high-resolution Echelle spectrometer, high signal-to-noise optical emission spectra can be obtained from almost any desired target. When the ablation target contains bacterial cells, the inorganic elements present in the bacterial cells (phosphorous, magnesium, calcium, and sodium) can be used to discriminate the bacteria on the basis of their atomic emission spectrum alone. Currently, we deposit bacterial cells onto a nitrocellulose filtration medium by centrifuging very low titer liquid specimens through a custom-fabricated centrifuge tube insert device. Prior to centrifugation, the bacteria cells are obtained by swabbing abiotic surfaces upon which a known number of bacteria cells have been deposited. The cells are then shaken off the disposable pathology swabs into a water suspension in a vortex mixing instrument. Spectra from five different bacterial pathogens and pathogen surrogates (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, Mycobacterium smegmatis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterococcus faecalis) and sterile water control specimens have been obtained along with spectra from sterile deionized water control specimens. This presentation will detail our efforts to identify and optimize chemometric algorithms for the autonomous classification of unknown spectra. Algorithms such as principal component analysis (PCA), discriminant function analysis (DFA), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA), and artificial neural networks (ANN) have been investigated. Rates of sensitivity and specificity have been determined and will be presented for the various techniques. Efforts to use chemometric algorithms to discriminate low-titer suspensions from blank water specimens and thus calculate limits of detection and limits of identification will also be discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.450
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUnderline Science Inc.French-language works237,207