MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6910320367 · doi:10.4230/lipics.icalp.2023.28

Nondeterministic Interactive Refutations for Nearest Boolean Vector

2023· article· en· W6910320367 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueDROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChinese University of Hong KongEuropean Commission
KeywordsNondeterministic algorithmBoolean functionCube (algebra)RandomnessMaximum satisfiability problemLinear subspaceMatrix (chemical analysis)Two-element Boolean algebra

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most n-dimensional subspaces 𝒜 of ℝ^m are Ω(√m)-far from the Boolean cube {-1, 1}^m when n < cm for some constant c > 0. How hard is it to certify that the Nearest Boolean Vector (NBV) is at least γ √m far from a given random 𝒜? Certifying NBV instances is relevant to the computational complexity of approximating the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Hamiltonian, i.e. maximizing x^TAx over the Boolean cube for a matrix A sampled from the Gaussian Orthogonal Ensemble. The connection was discovered by Mohanty, Raghavendra, and Xu (STOC 2020). Improving on their work, Ghosh, Jeronimo, Jones, Potechin, and Rajendran (FOCS 2020) showed that certification is not possible in the sum-of-squares framework when m ≪ n^1.5, even with distance γ = 0. We present a non-deterministic interactive certification algorithm for NBV when m ≫ n log n and γ ≪ 1/mn^1.5. The algorithm is obtained by adapting a public-key encryption scheme of Ajtai and Dwork.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics)Same topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207