Niveau 1: Outil de sélection préliminaire en fonction des risques sismiques (OSP) pour les bâtiments existants. Partie 2: documentation technique à l'appui
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'OSP de niveau 1 vise à déterminer rapidement les bâtiments dont le rendement sismique peut être évalué avec une certitude raisonnable sur la base de quatre critères clés, à savoir : (1) la sismicité; (2) l'édition du CNB de référence; (3) le temps d'occupation restant; et (4) les conséquences d'une défaillance. L'OSP de niveau 1 permet également de déterminer les conditions particulières qui déclenchent immédiatement une évaluation plus approfondie des risques sismiques. Ces conditions sont (1) type de bâtiment modèle inconnu, (2) désignation patrimoniale fédérale, (3) changement d'usage qui augmente des charges structurales, (4) conséquences de défaillance supérieures aux conséquences de défaillance initiales, (5) catégorie d'emplacement F (comme les sols liquéfiables), et (6) présence de dangers géologiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".