MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6910328666 · doi:10.4224/20378290

Fire endurance experiments on FRP-strengthened reinforced concrete columns

2005· report· en· W6910328666 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2005
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforced concreteFire resistanceFire testResearch councilCold climateFire protection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three full-scale fire resistance tests were conducted at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in partnership with ISIS Canada and Fyfe Co. LLC, to investigate the behaviour of fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) wrapped (confined) reinforced concrete columns under exposure to the standard fire. Both columns were provided with a unique supplemental fire protection system. The results of fire endurance experiments on the three full-scale columns are described in this report. These tests were conducted as part of a collaborative research program, aimed at studying fire endurance of FRP-wrapped reinforced concrete columns. The test results suggest that, by providing proper fire insulation as described in this report, a 4-hour fire endurance rating can be achieved for loaded reinforced concrete columns strengthened with FRPwraps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCFrench-language works237,207