An effective detection strategy and determining critical habitat characteristics for Boreal Felt Lichen (Erioderma pedicellatum) in Newfoundland, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Boreal felt lichen (Erioderma pedicellatum) is a rare lichen that is listed as critically endangered by the IUCN. On the island of Newfoundland, Canada, the Central Avalon Forest Ecoregion is a hotspot for this species. The population in this region is relatively abundant, providing an opportunity to study its habitat requirements. I used occupied and unoccupied plots (each 5 m radius) to test critical habitat for boreal felt lichen. To ensure I effectively detected lichens in our plots, I developed a decoy lichen experiment to test the detection probability of these lichens. I applied the results from the decoy experiment to the habitat study. Although I could not consider time in the study, I discussed how the shortened lifespan of the host tree may constrain the temporal niche of boreal felt lichen. I identified critical habitat for boreal felt lichen, which will contribute to informed land use to help protect this population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".